spacer home your portugal information source to real estate and living in portugalRobert M.L. Snapper
spacer spacer spacer



Bike Erg SB 2018 : Indoor Rowing
Nonathon : Indoor Rowing
The benefit of low-cadence cycling : Cycling
Training in the Heat : General Health Info
Synching with Strava : Indoor Cycling
Wave surfing in Portugal : Wave surfing
What is wave surfing : Wave surfing
Tranings Guide Concept2 : Indoor Rowing
How fast do I lose fitness : Training
World Records on Row - Ski and Bike Erg : Records
Fitness level : Training
Decline due to aging : Training
Sport Injuries : Health
Principles of long distance running : Running
Padel versus Clips : Padels & Clips
Gears info for beginners : Gears
Strenght level calculator : Weightlifting
CANYON Roadlite : Bikes
CANYON Roadlite YT : Bikes
Karvonen : Measuring is Knowing
Official rowing site : Rowing
Heart Rate Bands RS : HR & HRV
Inversion tables : General Health Info
Word Records Men : Athletic
Women Rowers on the Olympics : Stories
What is indoor Rowing? : Indoor Rowing
Best Road Pedals : Cycling
VO2 Max Tables : General Health Info
Indoor rowing and health : Indoor Rowing
HRV by ithlete : HR & HRV
Saddle tilt : Cycling
Is Sleeping Naked Better for Your Health? : General Health Info
A special breakfast : General Health Info
Ergstick and Ergdata : Indoor Rowing
Heart Rate Variability or HRV : HR & HRV
HRV by Elite : HR & HRV
Frozen shoulder : General Health Info
BMI : General Health Info
Hit and Run : Stories
How to choose a bike saddle : Bikes
What is padel - You tube : Padels & Clips
Wat is padel - You Tube : Padels & Clips
Social Media and sharing : Social Media
Nokia : Blood Pressure
WR Marathon 2018 Kipchoge : Athletic
What is H I I T : Training
Bike gears for beginners : Gears
Tacx Bushiso Test : Home Trainers
VO2 Max : VO2Max
Cycling : World Hour Records
What and who is Citius-Altius-Fortius : Home
Making sense of drag factor : Indoor Rowing
History : Padels & Clips
Shoes and Clips : Cycling
Justine Renston : Profiles
Q-Power : Indoor Rowing
Surfing terms : Wave surfing
5 Tips to improve your sleep : General Health Info
How Beta blockers can affect performance : General Health Info
28-05-2018 : Indoor Rowing
You tube movies : Wave surfing
You Tube Videos : Bikes
Fitting handle bar tape : Bikes
Lactid Acid : General Health Info
Carbon or Aluminium : Handle Bars
Is Training By Heart Rate A Thing Of The Past? : HR & HRV
HR versus HRV : HR & HRV
What is BMI : General Health Info
Rowing Records Indoor RS : Indoor Rowing
Back cycling light : Cycling
Lucy Bartholomew : Stories
Indoor Home Trainers : Indoor Cycling
Training during holidays : Cycling
Strapping and taping : General Health Info
Cycling in Portugal : Cycling
Rowing Apps : APPS
The future of gears? : Gears
World Records Women : Athletic
8 Mistakes when measuring HRV : HR & HRV
Orthastatic Test : Measuring is Knowing
Influence Beta Blockers on performance : General Health Info

Gember : Gezondheids Info
Wie en wat is Citius-Altius-Fortius : Home
Maximale Hartslag : Gezondheids Info
Fietsmaat berekenen : Fietsen
Verzettentabel : Fietsen
Depressie of een dippie : Gezondheids Info
Inspanningstest : Fietsen
Citius-Altius-Fortius : Home
Lijnzaad : Gezondheids Info
Fietsen in Portugal : Fietsen
Hartslag zones : Meten is Weten
Mijn hartslag zones : Meten is Weten
De ideale fietspositie : Fietsen
Polar Testen : Meten is Weten
Bloeddrukwaarden : Meten is Weten
Invloed sporten op dementie : Gezondheids Info
Rafael Nadal : Tennis
Hartslag : Gezondheids Info
Nadal Tennisaccademie : Tennis
Hoeveel caloriën om 1kg. vet te verbranden : Gezondheids Info
Hoeveel caloriën om 1kg. vet te verbranden : Gezondheids Info
Hoeveel caloriën in wijn : Gezondheids Info
Derailleur afstellen : Wielrennen
Risico factoren hartaanval : Gezondheids Info
Diabetes 1 en 2 : Gezondheids Info
Hartslag Variabelen : Gezondheids Info
Runners world : Nieuwsberichten
Herstel van training : Gezondheids Info
Wat is indoor roeien? : Indoor Roeien
Bloeddrukwaarden : Gezondheids Info
Invloed van temperatuur op prestaties : Meten is Weten
10 goede redenen om te gaan fietsen : Fietsen
Herken een hartaanval : Gezondheids Info
Oversteek Stille Oceaan : Zwemmen
Mijn indoor roei records : Indoor Roeien
Mijn indoor fiets records : Bike Erg
Ski-Erg 2017-2018 : Records
Hartslag meten : Gezondheids Info
Lage Hartslag in Rust : Algemene Info
VanMoof fietsen : Fietsen
Hartritme stoornissen : Gezondheids Info
Mijn hartslag zones : Meten is Weten
Invloed van Beta blokkers op sportprestaties : Gezondheids Info

spacer spacer spacer

print articleIndoor rowing and health


Indoor Rowing For Bone Health By Andrew Hamilton BSc Hons MRSC
Indoor rowing is deservedly regarded as a superb method of building cardiovascular fitness and all round muscular endurance, which is great news fo r anybody wishing to get and stay fit. However, as we become an increasingly ageing population, it’s more important than ever that the exercise we do confers us with health as well as fitne ss benefits. The bad news is that modern Western societies are facing an unprecedented epidemic of osteoporosis, a bone disease that wreaks havoc in the lives of those it affects. The good news is that new rese arch demonstrates that indoor rowing could be the perfect way to maintain bone health. Andrew Hamilton explains…
WHAT IS OSTEOPOROSIS? Osteoporosis is a disease that affects mainly (but not exclusively) older people in which bones gradually become more fragile and likely to break. These broken bones are also known as fractures and typically occur in the hip, spine, and wrist. Osteoporosis is often known as the ‘silent crippler’ because it often progresses painlessly and unnoticed, until a bone actually breaks. Although any bone can be affected, fractures of the hip and spine are particularly problematical because they can produce a number of long-term complications including loss of ability to walk and permanent disability, loss of height, severe back pain, deformity and even death.
HOW DOES OSTEOPOROSIS AFFECT BONES? The term ‘osteoporosis’ quite literally means 'porous bones'. Contrary to popular belief, bone is not ‘dead’ or ‘inert’ material. It is alive and constantly changing. Old, worn out bone is broken down by cells called osteoclasts and replaced by bone building cells, called osteoblasts. This process of constant renewal is called bone turnover. Although the precise mechanisms are poorly understood, osteoporosis affects this process of renewal; the hallmark of osteoporosis is a reduction in skeletal mass caused by an imbalance between bone resorption and bone formation. This results in reduced bone mineral density (BMD).
If you were to look at the interior of your bones under a microscope (see below), you would see that they are comprised of a thick outer shell and a strong inner ‘mesh like structure’, which is filled with collagen (protein), calcium salts and other minerals. This mesh structure looks a bit like honeycomb, with blood vessels and bone marrow in the spaces between the actual bony structure. Osteoporosis occurs when these spaces become bigger, making the structure fragile and liable to break easily. Unfortunately, once the bone has become ‘porous’, the mesh like structure cannot be regenerated back to its original dense form (although it can be made stronger – more later).

 Image courtesy of International Osteoporosis Foundation (
OSTEOPOROSIS FACT AND FIGURES Despite a relative low profile in the media, the facts and figures on osteoporosis are quite shocking:

An estimated 3 million people in th e UK suffer from osteoporosis;

One in two women and one in five men will suffer a fracture after the age of 50 1 ;

The lifetime risk of fracture in women at age 50 years is greater than the risk of breast cancer or cardiovascular disease 2 ;

On the basis of current trends, hip fracture rates in the UK will increase from approximately 46,000 per year in 1985 to 117,000 per year in 2016 3 ;

Hip fractures cause more than 1150 premature deaths each month 4 ;

A woman who sustains one or more vertebral fr actures will have a 4.4 fold higher mortality rate than a woman who has no vertebral fractures 5 ;
Moreover, the consequences of osteoporosis place a huge financial burden on the healthcare system. For example, the combined cost of hospital and social care for hip fracture patients alone amounts to more than £1.73 billion per year in the UK6, similar to the £1.75 billion that coronary heart disease costs the NHS each year. The rising incidence of osteoporosis means that the cost of treating osteoporotic fractures in post-menopausal women is now predicted to increase to more than £2.1 billion by 20207, while the total cost of all fractures each year in the UK is currently the same as the predicted cost of London’s 2012 Olympics!
The costs of osteoporosis are not just financial however. A hip or spine fracture often leads to extended or even permanent pain, immobility and/or disability, requiring continuing medical treatment. The impact on lifestyle can be devastating; during the first 12 months after a hip fracture more than half of people who could walk unaided prior to the fracture will subsequently be unable to walk independently, while 55% of patients will require assistance at home and a third will experience difficulty sleeping due to pain8. Indeed, research has shown that 80% of older women would rather die than experience the reduced quality of life that inevitably follows a serious hip fracture and subsequent admission to a nursing home9.
Figure 1 – Typical changes in bone mineral density with age
Graphic courtesy of National Osteoporosis Society (
WHAT CAUSES OSTEOPOROSIS? Although we don’t yet fully understand the disease process, there are a number of factors that are known to increase the risk of developing osteoporosis. These include:
• Genetic makeup - Twin and family studies suggest that osteoporosis has a large genetic component10,11; • Poor nutrition – there is a wealth of evidence to suggest that diets low in calcium (the main bone mineral) and vitamin D (which stimulates calcium uptake into body tissues) are associated with an increased risk of developing osteoporosis in later life; • Lack of exercise – being physically inactive is a major risk factor for developing osteoporosis. This is because vigorous physical activity is very effective at stimulating the uptake of calcium into bones, thereby helping to build bone mass in earlier years, and reducing the loss of bone mass in later years12; • Alcohol and smoking - An alcohol intake of more than 2 units per day increases the risk of an osteoporotic fracture13, while smokers also have a significantly increased risk of having a fracture 14; • Menopausal changes in women - During the menopause the ovaries produce lower levels of the female hormone estrogen, which is essential for bone health. After the menopause the rate of bone loss accelerates, increasing the risk of osteoporosis15.
The good news is that while you can’t change your genetic makeup or age, you can considerably reduce your risk of developing osteoporosis by improving your lifestyle. If you are not already, one of the most powerful ways to do this is to become much more physically active.
ROLE OF EXERCISE IN OSTEOPOROSIS PREVENTION When you’re physically activity, mechanical loads are transmitted to the bones in two ways; through gravitational forces ( ie the weight-bearing loading transmitted through bones) and through muscular pull (the forces transmitted by muscles to bones they’re attached to when you contract those muscles). These effects however are localised; if you want to build bone strength in your femur (main thigh bone), you need to exercise in way that either stresses the femur with gravitational or muscular contraction forces, or even better, both! This explains why for example, in ‘one-handed’ sports such as tennis, the bone mineral density (BMD) in the dominant arm is much higher than in the other arm.

 Research has shown that the higher the muscular and impact load (gravitational) forces, the higher the BMD produced; so for example, gymnasts whose sport requires high loadings and impacts tend to have higher BMDs than endurance runners16. By contrast, research suggests that those who participate in sports with plenty of muscular motion, but without substantial loading ( eg
 swimming) do not achieve the high BMDs of sports with higher loading17. There’s also evidence that activities that develop strength (such as weight training) are particularly effective at producing high BMDs in the hip and spine18,19.
Muscle strength and muscle mass also appear to be an important determinant of BMD. Studies have shown that the strength of hip abductor muscles is a strong predictor of hip BMD in both pre and post-menopausal women (more strength = higher BMD)20. There are two likely reasons why this is so; larger, stronger muscles are able to exert more loading forces on the bones they attach to; secondly, larger muscle masses are associated with higher body weight, which thus increases the gravitational loading on bones.
GROUND REACTION FORCE IN EXERCISE To stimulate bone strengthening, any exercise must load the bones significantly more than the normal activities of daily living. In particular, the concept of a ‘Ground Reaction Force’ (GRF) has become a popular way to assess the potential benefit of a particular mode of exercise. The term GRF commonly describes the forces that are produced in the bones when we decelerate a limb, for example footstrike during running or walking, or landing after a gymnastics jump.
These deceleration forces can temporarily far exceed the normal forces experienced by our bones when we’re motionless. For example, GRFs at the lumbar spine during weight training can exceed 5-6 times body weight21, while GRFs of 10-12 times body weight have been observed in gymnasts22. Although there are a number of ways of producing sufficient force within bones to stimulate strengthening, the notion of working against gravity and using decelerative forces created by impact ( eg by walking or jogging) as the most efficient way to strengthen bones has rapidly gained currency among health professionals. However, the reality is not quite so straightforward as we shall see; walking alone has not been shown to be an effective way of arresting BMD loss in post-menopausal women23.
INDOOR ROWING AND BONE HEALTH Before we discuss the role of indoor rowing in helping to prevent osteoporosis, let’s just recap on what we’ve already learnt:
• The higher the loading on the bones during exercise, the greater the potential for bone strengthening; • Loading can arise from both muscular pull and gravitational forces; • The more muscles involved in loading the better, because more bones will be affected (remember the loading effect via muscles is localised to the bones to which they’re attached); • High loadings can arise from strong muscular pull, from large deceleration forces during impact, or a combination of the two; • Higher muscle mass favourably affects BMD (through increased ability to generate muscular pull and higher body weight, which increases GRFs during impact activities).
The generally accepted consensus among many health professionals is that high-impact weightbearing exercise (which produces high GRFs via deceleration) is the best exercise for bones, while low impact exercise such as rowing, cycling, swimming etc. is not nearly as effective. However,
while a number of studies have indicated that swimming is less effective than weight-bearing exercise for increasing/maintaining BMD, this is a gross over-simplification.
If you consider the checklist above, it’s clear that the physiological demands of indoor rowing are very much in line with those required to build bone density:
• Rowing requires muscular strength and power in addition to endurance; this means that large amounts of muscular loading via muscular pull are generated during rowing; • Rowing works a large number of muscles, which means that many bones are loaded; • Rowing develops lean muscle mass, which is positively correlated to BMD; • Rowing generates large forces in the spine – excellent for building BMD in the vertebrae (more later).
Yes, it lacks the impact-generating forces associated with running, but that isn’t necessarily a disadvantage.
WHAT DOES THE RESEARCH SAY? To properly assess the efficacy of rowing for bone health, we need to consult the scientific literature, and the good news for would-be indoor rowers is that rowing appears to offer very substantial benefits. Some of the research studies carried out in the last 15 years, which provide positive evidence for the bone health benefits of rowing include:
• A study carried out on male rowers, triathletes and sedentary subjects (controls), which found that rowers had significantly higher BMD in the spine and total BMD than the triathletes (whose sport includes high-impact generating running) and of course the sedentary controls24. The researchers concluded that this was most likely due the increased lean muscle mass and strength induced by the rowing training; • A study on the effects of an 18-month rowing program on 14 adolescent female rowers and 10 matched controls, which found that the accretion of BMD in the lumbar spine area was significantly greater (over 6% higher) in the rowers compared to the controls25. • A study on 14 female rowers and matched controls, which found that not only did the rowers have higher BMD in the lumbar spine, but also that during a 6-minute race on the Concept 2 Indoor Rower, the muscular pull forces generated in the region of L4-L5 were equivalent to 4.6 times body weight26. Interestingly, these forces compare favourably with those during weight training, which is widely considered as one of the very best bone building exercises; • An 11-month study on thirty-nine women aged 60-74 years, which compared the effects of joint-reaction forces (JRF - muscular pull generated through weight training and rowing) on BMD with those of ground reaction forces (GRF - impact activities; walking, jogging and stair climbing) and with sedentary controls27. The BMD of the whole body, lumbar spine, proximal femur, and distal forearm was assessed five times at approximately 3-month intervals. The results showed that compared to the controls, the GRF and JRF exercise programs resulted in significant and similar increases in BMD of the whole body, lumbar spine, and Ward's triangle region of the proximal femur. The researchers also found that the JRF exercise program (but not the GRF) produced increases in lean body mass and strength. This is interesting because research has also shown that higher levels of muscular strength are associated with a reduced risk of falls (and therefore fracture) in the elderly28.
THE IMPACT OF IMPACT EXERCISE As we’ve seen, you don’t necessarily need impact-generated forces to help increase bone density. Because of its strength demands, a properly constructed rowing program is more than capable of producing the beneficial bone health effects described above. And that’s good news because the kind of exercise that generates impact forces ( eg jogging, running, skipping etc.) has a major drawback; that impact is also transmitted through the joints, which places additional stresses and strains on the joints, especially the joint cartilage.
While this is not a problem for the average 25-year old with healthy joints, it could be a very great problem for an older person whose joints may be already affected by arthritis or other degenerative conditions. Indeed, given that maintaining BMD becomes ever more important with increasing age, the very people who stand to gain from impact exercise are the same group who are potentially most adversely affected by it.
Moreover, because bone building requires regular exercise over a period of months and years to produce a really significant effect, the cumulative effects of high-impact exercise over such an extended period could be quite severe.
But there’s good news here too as new research on 60 rowers, cross-country runners, swimmers and sedentary controls has indicated that indoor rowing can offer the best of both worlds to the older person; large bone building benefits with low stresses on the joints29. 
In the study, the researchers looked at urinary levels of two compounds following exercise. NTx is a bone reabsorption marker; higher levels mean the body is actively taking up the nutrients required to build bone. CTx-II on the other hand is cartilage stress marker; higher levels indicate more that the cartilage in joints has been subjected to more stress.
The study compared the post-exercise levels of NT-x and CTx-II in the rowers, cross-country runners and swimmers, and also compared these levels with those from a control group who were inactive. The results were as follows:
• The bone building marker NTx was highest of all in the rowers, and higher in rowers and runners than in the swimmers or controls; • The cartilage degradation marker CTx-II was significantly higher in runners than in rowers, swimmers or the controls;
The researchers concluded that although running (traditionally regarded as one of the best bone building exercises) produced more bone growth stimulus than swimming, it did so at the cost of the high levels of cartilage stress. Rowing on the other hand seemed to offer the best compromise of the all – the highest amount of bone growth stimulation without the degree of cartilage stress produced by running!
CONCLUSION Osteoporosis is a serious and growing health problem, which will affect many people as they enter the later years of their life. A healthy lifestyle can play a major role in reducing the risk of osteoporosis and one of the most powerful ways to achieve this is by ongoing, regular physical exercise sustained throughout mid and later life. There’s a common misconception that only weight bearing and impact type exercise can effectively build bone, but this is not true. Any exercise that loads the bones sufficiently can increase bone mass.
Numerous scientific studies have confirmed that rowing fulfills this criterion and is an effective means of building BMD. Moreover, it offers other benefits; it’s especially effective at building spinal BMD, it helps increase lean body mass, which is also associated with increased BMD and also
develops muscular strength and power, which may help to reduce the risk of falls in the elderly. A further advantage is that rowing is kind to joints and cartilage, which is another advantage for the older person. No one exercise can ever be perfect, but rowing is probably as close as it gets!
Andrew Hamilton BSc Hons MRSC ACSM
NB – If you have already been diagnosed with osteoporosis, you should seek medical advice before commencing a rowing program.
1. Van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG and Cooper C., (2001). Bone 29: 517-522 2. WHO Study Group (1994). 843: 1-129. WHO Technical Report Series 3. Dennison E, Cole Z and Cooper C., (2005). Curr Opin Rheumatol 17: 456-461. 4. Melton LJI. Epidemiology of fractures. In: Osteoporosis: etiology, diagnosis and management, edited by Riggs BL and Melton LJI. New York: Raven Press, 1988, p. 133-154. 5. Jalava T, Sarna S, Pylkkanen L, Mawer B, Kanis JA, Selby P, Davies M, Adams J, Francis RM, Robinson J and Mccloskey E., (2003). J Bone Miner Res 18: 1254-1260. 6. Torgerson D, Iglesias C and Reid DM. The Effective Management of Osteoporosis. In: The economics of fracture prevention, edited by Barlow DH, Francis RM and Miles A. 2001, p.111-121. 7. Burge RT., (2001) Journal of Medical Economics 4: 51-62. 8. Osnes EK, Lofthus CM, Meyer HE, Falch JA, Nordsletten L, Cappelen I and Kristiansen IS., (2004) Osteoporos Int 15: 567-574. 9. Salkeld G, Cameron, I. D., Cumming, R. G., Easter, S., Seymour J, Kurrle, S., and Quine, S. (2000) Br Med J 320: 341-346. 10. Pocock NA, Eisman JA, Hopper JL, Yeates MG, Sambrook PN and Eberi S., (1987) J Clin Invest 80: 706-710. 11. Seeman E, Hopper JL, Bach LA, Cooper ME, Parkinson E, McKay J and Jerums G.,1989) N Engl J Med 320: 554-558. 12. Vuori IM., (2001) Med Sci Sports Exerc 33: S551-S586. 13. Kanis JA, Johansson H, Johnell O, Oden A, De Laet C, Eisman JA, Pols H and Tenenhouse A., (2005) Osteoporos Int 16: 737- 742. 14. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Kroger H, McCloskey EV, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ, Pols H, Reeve J, Silman A and Tenenhouse A., (2004) Osteoporos Int 16: 155-162. 15. Heaney RP, Recker RR and Saville PD., (1978) J Lab Clin Med 92: 964-970. 16. Robinson et al, (1995); J Bone Mineral Res 10:26-35. 17. Taaffe et al. (1995) J Bone Miner Res 10:586-593 18. Conroy et al., (1993) Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:1103-1109 19. Henrich et al., (1990) Med Sci Sports Exerc 22:558-563 20. Snow-Harter et al., (1993) Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:Suppl S153 21. Granhad et al., (1987) Spine 12:146-149 22. LaRiviere et al., (1995) Med Sci Sports Exerc 27(Suppl):S68 23. Cavanaugh DJ, Cann CE., (1988) Bone:201-204 24. Smith R, Rutherford OM., 1993) Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993;67(4):330-4 25. Morris FL, Payne WR, Wark JD., (1999) Osteoporos Int. 0(5):361-8 26. Morris FL et al (2000) Int J Sports Med. Oct;21(7):518-23 27. Kohrt WM, Ehsani AA, Birge SJ Jr., (1997) J Bone Miner Res. 1997 Aug;12(8):1253-61 28. American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,2001, 49:664-672 29. O'Kane JW, Hutchinson E, Atley LM, Eyre DR., (2006) Osteoarthritis Cartilage. Jan;14(1):71-6


Date Inserted: 30 May 2018
Have questions or comments on this article? email me


print article

spacer spacer
spacer spacer
Copyright © 2002-2019 Ricola Algarvia Ldª. All rights reserved. Legal Notices | Privacy Policy
Protected by the copyright laws of the EU and by international treaties.